Every Legal Decision.

Verified.

ActionAI scores each automated review against the clause library and controlling authority a lawyer would check by hand. Anything that scores low goes to a reviewer with the failed rule and the source brief already on screen.

240+

hours returned per verdict

10%+

higher accuracy than human baseline

$2M

return on deployment

Where the reliability layer shows up in the workflow

A contract reviewed against the wrong jurisdiction can void the indemnification cap you drafted. Cite a precedent that was overturned between research and filing, and the brief goes out arguing law that no longer exists. Miss a document in discovery and the firm eats the sanction. In legal, ground truth is the controlling authority or clause library the work depends on. ActionAI scores every automated contract review and brief check against that rule, and high-confidence decisions release without a lawyer opening the file. Below threshold, ExEx (Explainable Exceptions) routes the file to a lawyer with the controlling authority and brief passage attached, so they open the case knowing what to verify.

RAK Ceramics

RAK Ceramics — 18,000+ Hours Saved on Invoice Processing

RAK Ceramics deployed ActionAI to automate invoice processing across their global operations — achieving 15× efficiency gains and 18,000+ hours saved annually.

This is some text inside of a div block.

18,000+

Hours saved / year

15×

Efficiency gain

99.6%

Extraction accuracy

Frequently asked questions

What kind of legal work can ActionAI verify?

Contract review, citation checking, discovery screening, and any repeatable workflow where an AI is drafting or reviewing against a known standard. Each automation deploys independently, so firms can start with one process and expand.

How does it handle work that isn't clearly right or wrong?

Every decision carries a confidence score, and anything below threshold routes to a lawyer with full context rather than getting signed off automatically. This is Explainable Exceptions — ActionAI's patent-pending reliability protocol.

Does ActionAI mean swapping our research or DMS tools?

No. It connects to whatever system holds the master — document management, research platform, billing — via API or data export, and runs the verification on top.

Is it a multi-year deployment?

No. A scoping call runs 1-2 hours to identify the highest-ROI process, and a free pilot delivers results in days to weeks, not the 13-month enterprise AI average.

Has this actually worked in a judicial or legal setting?

Yes. UAE Courts runs ActionAI underneath every verdict, scoring citations and exhibits — it's the first automation on record to outperform human judges, saving 240+ hours per verdict with a 10%+ accuracy gain.

Your appeals problem is a verification problem.

Fifteen minutes on a sample of your caselaw citations surfaces the authority mismatches waiting in your pipeline.